Clarity on AB 1949 – California’s New Bereavement Leave Law

California has enacted a new bereavement leave requirement into law, effective January 1, 2023. The new law requires employers with five or more employees, including those covered by a collective bargaining agreement, to provide up to five days of unpaid leave to eligible employees for the death of a family member. The bill defines “family member” as a spouse, child, parent, sibling, grandparent, grandchild, domestic partner, or parent-in-law of the employee.

There seems to be confusion within the industry on if the bereavement leave authorized under AB 1949 is paid or unpaid. Upon introduction, we worked with the author to ensure the leave was “unpaid leave” and that the proposed law was not changed to “paid leave” throughout the legislative process. To be clear, AB 1949 does not provide any new state mandated paid time off. With that in mind, while on bereavement leave, an employee can use other available paid time off such as vacation pay, personal leave, or sick leave that they may have accrued.

Under the new law, bereavement leave is only available to employees who have worked for the employer for at least thirty days prior to the commencement of the leave. The five days of leave do not need to be taken consecutively but must be completed within three months of the death of the family member.

Employers are allowed to confirm the need for leave by asking for documentation, such as a death certificate, a published obituary, or a written verification of death, burial, or memorial services from a funeral home or other applicable entity. The request from the employer for documentation must occur within thirty days of the employee’s first day of leave.

The bill includes enforcement provisions that allow employees to file claims against employers who prevent them from taking bereavement leave or who take adverse employment actions against employees who take their leave. However, an especially crucial point for employers is that the bill is codified under the California Government Code and not the California Labor Code. This means that, while employers may see retaliation claims stemming from this new law, employees will not be able to file claims under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) for any alleged violations.

Recent Posts

WPCCA Introduction to Microsoft Copilot 365 – Part 2

Building on our introduction to Microsoft Copilot 365, this session will explore practical applications in everyday tasks. Discover how Copilot can enhance your productivity in Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, and Teams. In part 2 of this training, JoLynn Rihn will demonstrate…

February 4, 2025

WPCCA Introduction to Microsoft Copilot 365 – Part 1

Dive into the world of Microsoft Copilot 365 with this introductory session. Learn the basics of how Copilot can assist you in your daily tasks, from drafting emails to generating reports. In Part 1 of this training, led by Microsoft…

February 4, 2025

Support Industry Legislation to Cap Retention on Private Construction Contracts at 5%

On behalf of the industry, Senator Dave Cortese (D-San Jose, CA) has introduced SB 61, to establish a 5% cap on retention for private construction contracts in California. This measure aligns private project retention practices with the successful 5% cap…

January 28, 2025

Brunch Break

Join us in an opportunity to get to know your fellow WPCCA members for brunch at the beautiful Old Ranch Country Club in Seal Beach! This event will feature a presentation by Allen Carberry, Safety Training Coordinator at DC 36…

January 22, 2025

WPCCA Economic Outlook Webinar: Monetary Masala

With the presidential and congressional elections of 2024 in the rearview, our eyes turn to 2025.  Has the Federal Reserve engineered a soft landing, or is stagflation on the way?  Can America continue to pace the advanced world, or will…

January 7, 2025
MORE STORIES