New Contractors’ Board Disciplinary Tool May Give Relief to Contractors While Streamlining the Disciplinary Process for the Contractors’ Board

By Bruce Rudman of Abdulaziz, Grossbart & Rudman

The Legislature recently passed a bill (SB 486) which becomes effective January 1, 2018, and which adds another disciplinary tool to the Contractors’ Board. We believe this took is actually a huge benefit to the industry as well as the Board as it allows the Board to impose something less than a Citation with a five-year “Scarlet letter” reported on the CSLB website.

The Contractors’ Board previously had three disciplinary tools in its arsenal: a Warning Letter, a Citation, and an Accusation. A Warning Letter notified the contractor of the violation, but it is private and would merely stay in the file unless there were further violations of the same section. A Citation is like a traffic ticket, which if paid and complied with, the license stays in full force and effect. An Accusation is an effort to suspend or revoke a license; the settlement of that Accusation, if it can be settled, would include some substantial terms of probation. Since we are talking here about minor violations which only previously gave rise to a Citation, this article won’t focus on an Accusation.

The biggest problem with the Citation is that it is publicly reported on the Contractors’ Board’s website for five years from the completion of the Citation. This means that if you appeal it, it is reported for five years from when you ultimately pay the fine and do what you are ordered to do. The requirement that the Citation be reported for at least five years has caused many contractors to appeal Citations. Just appealing the Citation usually takes six to eight months, or more, before a hearing is held. The Contractors’ Board has reported that their costs of defending an appeal of a Citation sometimes is as much as $7,500, and that is not recoverable from the licensee and that is why liked the idea of the Letter of Admonishment. The industry should also like the idea of the Letter of Admonishment if it is properly used.

Starting in January, the Contractors’ Board can issue a Letter of Admonishment. This is similar to a reproval in other license categories, and the Letter of Admonishment would, in writing, describe the nature in facts of the violation. The initial appeal process would be through the Contractors’ Board itself, rather than through an Administrative Hearing before the Office of Administrative Hearings. There is still a judicial review process, but any lawyer would likely tell a contractor that by the time it takes to complete the judicial review process, the Admonishment would no longer be on the contractor’s file if it was not appealed. The benefit of the Letter of Admonishment is that it is reported for one year.

However, this tool will, hopefully, pacify many contractors concerned about disciplinary actions that show up on their public website for extended periods of time for what some would view as “ticky tack violations” or violations that didn’t cause any injury to the customer. I recently had the pleasure of giving a seminar along with the Registrar of Contractors, David Fogt, before a trade association of contractors. Mr. Fogt indicated that the Letter of Admonishment would be used for technical violations, such as form violations, and in some cases, failure to properly register salespersons. While he did not say so, it is unlikely to be used in any instance where there is a finding of a monetary injury to a consumer.

As noted, it is hopefully a means of easing up the workload of the disciplinary staff of the Contractors’ Board, allowing them to save cost on appeals, yet assisting contractors by reminding them of the obligations under the law without penalizing for the five years that the Scarlet Letter of a Citation remains on the public website.
We will have to see how the Contractors’ Board utilizes the Letter of Admonishment but for now, it seems like a tool that would greatly benefit the industry.

Recent Posts

California’s Minimum Wage to Increase to $16.00 Per Hour on January 1, 2024

California law mandates that the minimum wage be increased in response to inflation. Specifically, California Labor Code section 1182.12 delegates authority to the Director of Finance to annually determine and certify to the Governor and State Legislature whether an adjustment…

October 2, 2023

Employers Are Not Liable For The Spread of Covid to Employees’ Household Members

The California Supreme Court unanimously ruled that employers owe no duty to prevent “take home” cases of Covid-19 and are not liable to nonemployees who contract Covid from employee household members who bring the virus home from the workplace. The…

September 26, 2023

Brunch Break

Join us in an opportunity to get to know your fellow WPCCA members for brunch at the beautiful Old Ranch Country Club in Seal Beach! This event will feature a presentation by Molly Burns, Environmental Affairs Manager at Dunn-Edwards, who…

August 3, 2023

WPCCA 2023 Mid-Year Legislative Update

California State Legislature has crossed the midway point of the 2022 Legislative Session. Legislators had until June 2nd to move legislation out of their house of origin. Bills that did not clear that hurdle must be shelved for the year….

July 25, 2023

WPCCA Construction Contracts 101 Webinar Series: Private Works Remedies

This 2 part webinar series on Construction Contracts will provide an overview on construction contracts and means to mitigate risks for contractors and subcontractors engaging in public and private works. Join our part 2 webinar on Private Works Remedies presented…

July 11, 2023